1. What was most changelling to do and why?
For me, I think the hardst part was not repeating any material just to get to the time limit. To fix that I should have gone over the content the night before and added things if I needed to. Because I didn't want to be just saying extra stuff just to get to the time limit.
2. What is the difference between the literal and the interpretive in your presentation?
The literal part of my presentation was the background information that I gave on skateboarding. While researching, I found that skateboarding was a product of surfing, and that it was called sidewalk surfing in the 50's and 60's. The interpretive part of my presentation was when I was talking about what people think of when they think of skateboarding, and I shared my view on that, that they just think of the main stream pro skaters and just look right over all the people who really make it happen.
3. What will you take from this and apply to future presentations?
Now that I know who really makes skateboarding what it is, I can go into further research about those people and learn about what they do, so that in my future presentations, I will have more and better information to share.
4. What would you say stood out about your presentation preformance?
I think the fact that I had a poter there really hepled me with my preformance. I was able to point to the poster and show what exactly I was talking about. Also it was a good way to keep on track, because all I had to do was just follow what was on the poster.
No comments:
Post a Comment